<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.proudparenting.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>ProudParenting.com - U.S. Supreme Court - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.proudparenting.com/taxonomy/term/711</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;U.S. Supreme Court&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I agree that there would</title>
 <link>http://www.proudparenting.com/node/1861#comment-19586</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that there would have to be written agreement with the mother in order for a donor to exercise any rights. If I were going to be inseminated and my wife and I were planning to raise that child, I would hate to think any man could suddenly claim &#039;ownership&#039; of any sort for his 5-minute contribution.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:02:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Momx2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19586 at http://www.proudparenting.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
