ProudParenting.com - IVF - Comments

A & S in Texas

Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:13:51 -0700

Thank you we appeciate your comments M & S the proud mums!

So Exciting

Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:29:57 -0700

My partner of 10+ years and I are the proud moms to 2 1/2 year old Quads! We are so excited for y'all and wish you the very, very best! A&S in Texas

Me

Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:16:30 -0800

My partner and I plan on becoming one of those lesbian families in England next year :)

Baby's

Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:02:06 -0800

They are so cute me and my partner are wanting a baby.

lesbian couple in New York

Tue, 01 Jan 2008 06:17:01 -0800

In my opinion E.T. should be held accountable to support the child. They wanted the child. She inseminated vials of sperm into her partner. She cut the umbilical cord at the child's birth and cared for the child until they broke up. It's E.T's responsibility to help provide support for that child. She wanted the child at the time and did what ever was necessary to have the child. The courts should order her to pay back child support.

Right on

Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:09:50 -0800

Right on

This is a truely

Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:02:03 -0800

This is a truely inspirational family.

Love Love Love the DC

MammaMia — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 03:56:33 -0700

I've seen the Chicks in concert 3 times - and they are amazing. I love their outspoken way of living. The documentary "Shut Up and Sing" was very touching.

BTW, I've always thought Emily was the sexy one. :-)

California Laws

stephaniec — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:54:01 -0700

While the legislature in California does not specifically address surrogacy, case law does and in California, like Arkansas, the marital status of the surrogate is immaterial and the Intended Parents do not have to adopt their children; they are declared the parents prior to their child's birth. While I didn't know the laws were as favorable as they are in Arkansas, I wanted to clear up any misconceptions about California law.

Further, it's an even better state for lesbian couples who are are registered domestic partners as they do not have to petition the court to have their names placed on the birth certificate. If they are registered, the child is considered a child of their union and no further legal paperwork is needed.

please see Johnson v. Calvert and In Re Marriage of Buzzanca for further information on California surrogacy law.

Feel free to contact me at stephanie@surrogacy-lawyer.com or view my blog at http://surrogacylawyer.blogspot.com/.